![]() ![]() Surfshark supports torrent downloads and seeding on many dedicated P2P servers. Advantagesįirst off, the pros – and there are quite a few of them. Here are the pros and cons of using Surfshark for torrenting. Surfshark isn’t the perfect torrenting VPN, but it does get pretty close. Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Surfshark for Torrenting Also, most Redditors said they never got angry letters from copyright agencies (or trolls), and trade associations. Overall, it looks like people are happy with this VPN, and don’t experience major slowdowns. We also tried finding reviews on torrent client forums, but we didn’t find anything worthwhile. It’s the best site to find unbiased opinions. ![]() We also asked about the Surfshark torrenting experience on Reddit. We checked multiple Reddit threads to see what torrent users think of Surfshark. What Do People Think About Torrenting with Surfshark? And if there are no seeders, your download will stall until you find some. It’s because you’re downloading the torrent from only a few people. IMPORTANT: If the torrent has very few seeders, your download speeds will be extremely slow. As expected, we had slower speeds: 8-12 MiB/s (qBittorrent) and 1-2 MB/s (uTorrent). We also used the OpenVPN protocol while connected to the Bulgarian server. It took us about 40-45 minutes to download a 33.92 GB file on qBittorrent, and 1 hour 40-50 minutes on uTorrent. The speed boost was noticeable: 18-19 MiB/s (qBittorrent) and 7-9 MB/s (uTorrent). We also used a VPN server location close to the tester (Bulgaria) to get faster downloads. We were still happy with the download speeds. And even though WireGuard is lightweight, the encryption made the data packets heavier (meaning it took them longer to arrive). So, it took longer for data to travel between their device and the VPN servers. We used servers that were really far from our tester’s location. Singapore – 4 MiB/s (qBittorrent) and 2 MB/s (uTorrent).Japan – 2-4 MiB/s (qBittorrent) and 1-2 MB/s (uTorrent).Here are the speeds with the other servers: The ETA (Estimated Time of Arrival) increased to around 2-3 hours (uTorrent) and 1-1 hour and 30 minutes (qBittorrent). When we used the Canadian server, our qBittorrent speeds slowed down to around 10-13 MiB/s (81-110 Mbps), and our uTorrent speeds to around 3-5 MB/s (25-42 Mbps). On average, it took us about 10-15 minutes to download two 21.7 GB and 33.92 GB files. Here are our original download speeds: around 50 MB/s with uTorrent (377-395 Mbps) and 30-34 MiB/s with qBittorrent (250-285 Mbps). For reference, our tester is from Romania. We used qBittorrent and uTorrent, servers in Canada, Singapore, and Japan, and the WireGuard protocol. To see how fast torrenting with Surfshark is, we ran a few tests. We’ve also prepared a few good Surfshark torrenting VPN alternatives (+comparisons) if you want to explore other options. We discuss all these factors (and more) down below. Moreover, it lacks decent IPv6 leak protection, requiring users to disable IPv6 manually on their systems. However, it does lack a few speed-enhancing features (such as port forwarding and SOCKS5 support). We also enjoy the fact that it has no device limits, so you can safely torrent on all your gadgets. Torrent download speeds are quite fast, and are comparable to other industry giants (which we’ll see in a minute). The VPN works well with most popular torrenting clients, including uTorrent and qBittorrent. Strong encryption (with WireGuard support), P2P support on most of its servers, as well as a strict no-logs policy. ![]() It provides all the necessary tools to secure your torrenting traffic. Surfshark is an excellent torrenting VPN. Visit Surfshark Now! Is Surfshark Good for Torrenting? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |